|   At 
        an evening function held at the Agni Bar of Hotel Park, New Delhi, attended 
        by over 40 people, Robert announced that Hotel Hyatt Regency had again 
        offered the venue this year. Hyatt is one of the 5-star hotels promoting 
        wine drinking culture quite aggressively. Due to the still unresolved and complex issues of customs and excise 
        procedures, the competition will be held again in two stages, one in London 
        towards the end of October while the Delhi leg is expected to be completed 
        in November, shortly before IFE- India opens at the Pragati Maidan. As already informed to the producers and importers who formed the bulk 
        of those present, the launch was also an opportunity to air their views 
        and comments in order to make the challenge more meaningful. ‘It 
        is your programme. You must participate in it fully to get maximum benefits 
        out of the challenge,’ remarked Robert. Conceding that the post-challenge promotion might not have been sufficient; 
        delWine and Sommelier India were the only two media that had extensively 
        provides results etc, he nevertheless exhorted the winners to take some 
        action themselves.’ When Robert Parker or Wine Spectator gives ratings 
        or points to the wines, the producers go out themselves and blow their 
        trumpets. ‘We do hope to go out beyond these two profession media 
        and have mainstream newspapers and magazines publish and promote the results,’ 
        he added. Reacting to the issue of judges, he said he was perfectly satisfied with 
        the selection of judges at the last show, but sought the names of more 
        that could be added, for the consideration of the organisers. ‘If 
        we do not add the names you suggest, you might have a reason to complain. 
        We would like to keep the majority of judges as Indians, as the challenge 
        is meant for the Indian consumers and presumably the Indian tasters can 
        carry the case for the wines better.’ He was also sympathetic to a suggestion that the cost of entering samples 
        should be looked at. He announced that multiple entries would be given 
        discounts. One hopes that the organisers in London also consider the case 
        of lower entry costs for Indian producers, not all of whom may be cash 
        rich. Besides, importers entering customs duty paid wines should get some 
        consideration too, feels delWine. Some entrants who did not get the awards had tended to find flaws with 
        the challenge. For those he had a message too.’ In the Academy awards, 
        not everyone gets an Oscar. The non-winners do get disappointed. There 
        could also be human errors. But by selecting a divers panel of judges, 
        we do try to minimise the problem. Again a Federer nay be a champion but 
        one particular day, he may not be in his best. It does not mean he is 
        not the champion. So I suggest you take part in as many competitions as 
        possible. You will discover the real competitive value of your product.’ The personal choices cannot be avoided in such competitions.’ I 
        would not have given an Oscar to Forrest Gump, for instance.’ Also 
        taking issue with the definitive point system awards, he said, “How 
        can you rely only on the points given by just one person? The same person, 
        in any case might give different points to the same wine on two different 
        occasions, depending upon his mood-and after all, he is only a human being.’ 
        Taking part in more competitions is the only answer, he said with confidence. Again, reflecting on a suggestion from Amfora Wines who felt that for 
        a category having smaller number of wines-say 6-7, it does not make any 
        sense to have 3 medals, he said, ‘theoretically, if Chateau Margaux, 
        Latour and Haut Brion entered a competition, it would be grossly unfair 
        to give a Gold to only one of them. Similarly, even if you taste a category 
        of 50 wines, and do not feel there was Gold medal winner, one should not 
        award it.’ It is pertinent that none of the Indian wines had a Gold 
        and there was only one silver medal out of the 35 labels entered. One such producer Nine Hills was represented by Rukn Luthra, Business 
        head of Pernod Ricard, who has been associated with the project from scratch. 
        One of their reds had been declared the Best Red Indian wine. ‘We 
        are an MNC and take part in many international competitions where Robert 
        is involved. We are very confident of his professionalism and the way 
        he handles such competitions overseas. We shall be taking part in the 
        next IWC and any other competition that may come along as he suggests,’ 
        said Luthra.  Dharti Desai, partner of FineWinesnMore of Mumbai, supporting the Challenge 
        said,’ we are a nascent industry. We must support such competitions 
        in order to take our industry forward.’ She said, ‘we feel 
        happy that our choice of wines has been liked by the judges. We shall 
        take part in even bigger way this year.’ They had entered 14 labels 
        at the first IWC, with 13 walking away with some honours. Rewa Singh, publisher of Sommelier India, was fully supportive of the 
        challenge.’ There will always be some pitfalls. But we must support 
        and encourage such competitions,’ she said.  The launch party went well past the 8:30 hour, with people enjoying the 
        Buller wines provided by the importers, Pearls Wines. Chardonnay and Shiraz 
        were the rage and were the first ones to be polished off. Perhaps, the 
        delicious snacks provided by Rifaquat Ali’s team at the Agni were 
        finger-lickin’ good, and brought out the best in these Australian 
        wines! Subhash Arora Pics from the event will be uploaded soon-editor
 |