India's First Wine, Food and Hospitality Website, INDIAN WINE ACADEMY, Specialists in Food & Wine Programmes. Food Importers in Ten Cities Across India. Publishers of delWine, India’s First Wine.
Skip Navigation Links
About Us
Indian Market
Wine & Health
Wine Events
Retail News
Contact Us
Skip Navigation Links
Wine Tourism
Book Review
Photo Gallery
Readers' Comments
Video Wall
Media Partners
Ask Wineguyindia
Wine & Food
Wine Guru
Gerry Dawes
Harvest Reports
Mumbai Reports
Advertise With Us
US Report on Indian Market Released
Top Ten Importers List 2015-16
On Facebook
On Twitter
Delhi Wine Club
Anti Competition Excise Policy of Delhi

Posted: Wednesday, 08 December 2010 18:04

Feature: Anti Competition Excise Policy of Delhi

The current excise policy of demanding Rs.500,000 annual L-1 license fee and Rs.50,000 per label as registration charges, keeps the smaller domestic players out of the Delhi wine market and may be unconstitutional under Art 38 and 39 of the Constitution and the producers ought to consider approaching the Delhi government or the Competition Commission of India, preferably through the Indian Grape Processing Board for redress, writes Subhash Arora.

License for imported alcohol products

To sell imported wine and/or liquor in Delhi, an annual excise license needs to be procured by the wine importer on payment of Rs.500,000 and fulfilling strict procedural requirements. One can sell wine, or any imported liquor or spirits. This means that the person who holds the excise license can become a distributor for several importers who have to pay only the label registration charges. By working out the internal arrangements, the license holder becomes the distributor and can theoretically make his own licensing cost to nil or even make some profits by representing several importers.

The earlier license fee of Rs.200,000 was increased to the present amount a few years ago. Whether one imports spirits or only wine is immaterial; this motivates wine importers to add liquor to the portfolio as well, sooner or later. The spirits importers anyway are not as much affected as it is the wine importers who find this amount to be too high, thus limiting the players in the wine import sector and discouraging new entrants.

Anti-competitive label registration charge

In addition to the L-1 license fee of Rs.500,000 the Indian producer has to register each of his wine label by paying additional Rs.50,000 a label. This covers the registration cost chargeable at 1% of the wholesale cost-subject to this minimum. If a wine sells for Rs. 500, the wholesale price after removing the taxes including the VAT @20% is around say Rs.300. The assessed case cost would be Rs.3600-implying the label registration of Rs.36 a case. If the sale is up to appx 1400 cases (Rs. 50,000/36), no more charges need be paid. For higher sales, Rs.36 a case is charged which is an extra burden for a big company like Sula, Indage or Grover who sell perhaps more than 5000 cases of one single label.

Additional Vend Fee

The vend fee which works out at around Rs.50 a bottle, depending upon the slab rates, is extra and this is where the excise department generates revenues. It would make even more money, if the small producers were allowed to register at no label registration or a nominal Rs.1000-2000 a label to defray the overhead expenses, without the minimum Rs. 50,000 which is payable at the moment. More producers, more variety, more sales, more excise revenues, happier consumers, increased production, improved quality-where is the problem?

Unfair to the Small Producers

I had the unpleasant task of taking the lead and writing about this policy after the Hon’ble Minister of Food and Processing Industry, Mr. Subodh Kant Sahai stated at the first National Conference of the IGPB earlier this year that despite difficulties, the UPA government had been able to separate wine and liquor and I had disagreed.

I gave the simple example that despite the mammoth efforts of the ministry and the Hon’ble minister, the Delhi government had made it impossible for the small producer making some quality wines to enter the expanding and relatively sophisticated Delhi market making it an investment of Rs.700,000 before selling a single bottle of wine!

Many of our domestic producers making quality wines are languishing due to this anti-competitive policy as they cannot enter Delhi and the demise of their enterprise is imminent.

Articles 38 and 39

Article 38 sec 1 of the Constitution of India states that the ‘State shall strive to promote the welfare of the people by securing and protecting as effectively as it may a social order in which justice, social, economic and political, shall inform all the institutions of the national life’. Read it with Article 39 C which states that the action should be such that  ‘the operation of the economic system does not result in the concentration of wealth and means of production to the common detriment.’

It is apparent that the Delhi Excise Department is being constitutionally unfair to the smaller wine producers and a corrective action must be taken.

MRTP and Competition Act 2002

The Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act 1969 has been modified and a new competition law called the Competition Act, 2002 is now in place though not yet in force fully. Only a few provisions of the new law have been brought into force but the Competition Commission of India under the new Act would be the right authority on whose shoulders the wine producers-especially the smaller ones can cry on.

Interestingly, even the big producers are not happy with the current regimen. Although Sula sells more cases than the minimum amount of Rs.50,000 justifies the excise payment, the CEO Rajeev Samant says, ‘we would like to see the registration charges of Rs.500,000 reduced to more reasonable levels. Moreover, we are not able to introduce many of our brands as the registration fee of Rs.50,000 does not justify introducing many of our labels,’ says Rajeev, adding that the registration charges in any case are too high, if you talk big numbers
Who will bell the cat

The question is who will bell the cat? Obviously, no dingle producer is ready for the hara-kiri. The couple of Nashik-based wine associations are more interested in wider issues like reduction of interest on loans, conversion of extra wine into alcohol and more subsidies in any ol’ way they can get from any source. They do not seem to be interested as this may not even be the common cause.

Ministry of Food Processing Industries and more specifically the Indian Grape Processing Board is the right choice-the only choice for spearheading this anti-competition policy, fit for a legal redress, if it were a private company one was dealing with. All constituents ought to be same for the Board and so they are in a position not only to take up the cause with full gusto, the result will mean a better and more universal acceptance from all producers of the Board- be it from Maharashtra, Karnataka, Haryana or even Mizoram.

Needless to say (actually, one needs to emphasize and say) that the dismantling of these two walls would expand the domestic wine market, encourage competition, improve quality and increase consumption. Of course higher excise duties shall be recovered.

Subhash Arora    



kaizad hansotia Says:

Hello Mr. Arora, I absolutely love reading all your articles on this website that have been very well articulated with simplicity so as to enable a common man to understand the nitty gritty involving in the wine business and industry. However there is one very basic question that i have been struggling to get answers from many people i have asked till now, and i hope that you might be able to give me some clarity on perhaps what you might call, a naive question. q1) Is there any way to start a home made wine business and offer it directly to the customer through the medium of the internet and not traditional routes of media such as TV, radio, etc. 2) If yes, how much cost in involved before i can start selling my first bottle of homemade wine? 3) Where can we avail the certifications of the quality of the wine, if at all required? Thanks and Regards, Kaizad

Posted @ May 31, 2010 10:25


MM Sharma Says:

As a practitioner in competition law, my comments are limited from competition law perspective. The current excise policy of demanding Rs.500,000 annual license fee and Rs.50,000 per label as registration charges,is certainly impeding competition in the wine market and amounts to creation of artificial "entry barriers" by the State Govt. of Delhi. , I feel that the policy is ,prima facie, having an "adverse effect on competition in the relevant market" and the policy is encouraging "market power" of the large producers which can be abused within the meaning of section 4 of the Competition Act or even promote cartelization amongst them . The Department of Excise, Delhi government being also involved in the activity relating to "control" of liquor and distribution of license therefor is also covered in the definition of "Enterprise" under the said Act and its decision to do so amounts to "limiting or restricting the market for wine manufacture and distribution services to the large producers",which is prohibited as an "abuse of dominant position" under section 4(2)(b) of the said Act. Competition Commission of India(CCI) is empowered to take suo motu cognizance of such anti competitive policy and if does not, an "information" can be filed by the small producers affected by such policy with the help of competition law experts to bring back real competition in this market. In fact the Delhi Govt should consider making a "reference " to CCI to give opinion on the effect of such policy on competition and whether it should be allowed to continue. MM Sharma, Advocate, Head-Competition Law Practice, Vaish associates, advocates. .

Posted @ December 20, 2010 16:48


Arjun Dhall Says:

Its surely a rip off for the law abiding importers but what about the ones who manage to balance or make up for the extras by selling expensive liquor and wine in grey market? Is there no law for them or is it them who make and break the law as per their very own convenience ?? This is exactly the reason why people prefer buying from such people or other petty bootleggers since there is always a huge difference in prices! All must get together to take a stand on bringing down customs duty and other levies/taxes so that there is no difference in pricing between whats sold in licensed places as compared to whats sold in grey market.. Thats the only way I think the system, the providers and the consumers will be content and happy.. Grey market operations are destroying the confidence of us providers. You too need to bring such people to light..... BR.

Posted @ December 13, 2010 14:00


Amit Agarwal Says:

Well said....

Posted @ December 13, 2010 11:02


Tarsillo Says:

OUT OF RECORD I learned from (un)reliable source that in next policy, Importers licence will be granted ONLY to those having their own bonded warehouse, i.e. less competition and worse storing conditions. The Excise never consult anyboby before its decisions. It is not transparent and not efficient at all!

Posted @ December 13, 2010 11:00


Want to Comment ?
Please enter your comments in the space provided below. If there is a problem, please write directly to Thank you.

Generate a new image

Type letters from the image:

Please note that it may take some time to get your comment published...Editor

Wine In India, Indian Wine, International Wine, Asian Wine Academy, Beer, Champagne, World Wine Academy, World Wine, World Wines, Retail, Hotel


Copyright©indianwineacademy, 2003-2020 |All Rights Reserved
Developed & Designed by Sadilak SoftNet