India's First Wine, Food and Hospitality Website, INDIAN WINE ACADEMY, Specialists in Food & Wine Programmes. Food Importers in Ten Cities Across India. Publishers of delWine, India’s First Wine.
 
 
Skip Navigation Links
Home
About Us
Indian Market
Wine & Health
Wine Events
Hotels
Retail News
Blog
Contact Us
Skip Navigation Links
Wine Tourism
Book Review
Launch
Winery
TechTalk
Photo Gallery
Readers' Comments
Editorial
Media
Video Wall
Media Partners
Ask Wineguyindia
Wine & Food
Wine Guru
Perspectives
Gerry Dawes
Harvest Reports
Mumbai Reports
Advertise With Us
Classifieds
US Report on Indian Market Released
Top Ten Importers List 2015-16
On Facebook
 
On Twitter
Delhi Wine Club
 

Posted: Wednesday, January 23 2008. 5:00 PM

Editorial: Maharashtra After (excise) Massacre

I am not talking of the massacre at the Bombay Stock Exchange of the last two days. I am concerned with the aftermath of the massacre carried out by the Maharashtra Excise department with their punishing blow to the imported wine drinkers.

The massacre did not single out any caste, colour or creed. It was directed only to one class- of decent quality imported wine drinkers. It was the state government's dictum to switch to Indian or cheap imported wines, or better still drink Scotch whisky and keep the English tradition alive. If you can afford the luxury of drinking better quality wines, better lighten your wallets, seems to be the refrain.

The market is limping back to life, but like a bullet that barely missed piercing the heart, recovery is painfully slow and life may never be the same again. Says Sumedh Mandla, partner of FineWinesNMore, a Mumbai based importer, the market is slowly picking up but the premium wines are pretty much dead in Maharashtra. With such high excise duties hotels are afraid of stocking premium wines; they are sticking with cheaper wines.

Maharashtra's biggest importer, Sanjay Menon's moustache seems to be flying at low mast. He is quite reticent.' What can a few importers do? We tried our best in reasoning with the department. Despite all assurances that the increase will be rationalised to Rs.300 a liter, the government has decided to change direction, we have to live with the policy'

Like Mandla and other importers, Menon is also focussing on cheaper imported wines.

Sula's Rajeev Samant, part of the 'Bombay Club' (others being presumably, Sanjay Menon of Sonarys, Ashwin Deo of Moet Hennessey and Amrit Kiran Singh, Area Director, South Asia, Brown and Foreman of Jack Daniels fame) concedes the government has been harsh. 'Local industry certainly needs protection against cheap wines costing less than a Euro; else they'd be flooding the market and would threaten the very existence of our nascent wine industry. 'We were ok with excise duty of 150% for cheaper imported wines. The higher end wines don't compete with us so we would be ok even with the excise duty of Rs. 300 a bottle that one had presumed would be the final decision by the department.'

Ranjit Dhuru, CEO of Dindori based Chateau d'Ori is an importer as well as a producer. He is simmering because of the excise duty increase. The plea taken by the government of protectionism for the local wineries is unfortunate for the industry in the long run, he feels. Chairman of Aftek Ltd., a listed IT company with a Rs.400 crore ($100m) revenues, says,' We are not only exporting our products and competing with the rest of the world, but are also successfully running a German company we bought in 2003. Similarly, unless we have more imported wines, how can we Indian producers compete with them and take our quality to higher levels?' he retorts.

Dhuru also imports wines from Bordeaux. He had the wines crafted specially for the Indian market for as low as Rs.600 when 'I would love to sell them for Rs.400 but I can't, because of high duties.' Since the price increase, he has been obliged to increase the price to Rs.850 on the basic wines.

I had written on July 31 about DIAGEO, the world's largest spirits business, with a presence in the imported wine segment had hired KPMG consultants to fight the Indian government in the continuing row over its unfair and punitive tax regime,

Obviously Diageo must be happy now because their liquor sales will get a tremendous boost. The effect on the sales of imported wines like Blossom Hills etc. is a small price to pay to get the honey pot.

Genrally speaking, even EU are the net gainers because it is the export of Scotch whiskies etc that were being affected a lot more than the wines, at least in the short run.

I often cite the example of the auto industry in India barely over 20 years ago when we were happily chugging along with Ambassador and Padmini cars, strongly opposing any foreign hand, until the arrival of Maruti which touched the life of every Indian and helped make some of the finest cars not only for our own use but for exports. Imports of quality wines will help the industry develop rather than be strnagulated

Maharashtra, which has the biggest market for wine and spirits, had imposed an additional excise duty of 200% on whisky and 150% on wines since July 9, 2007 after the central government had reduced the customs duty on wine and spirits to 150% and beer was left untouched at 100%.

In a shocking turn of events after the 'Bombay Club' met the excise officials, the excise duty on wines was further jacked up to 200% while for premium whiskies it was actually brought down from 200% to 75%! Drop Wine-Drink Whisky seems to be the slogan pushed implicitly by an otherwise pro-active Maharashtra.

During a chat with Amrit Kiran Singh, I asked him whether things could get more absurd than this, he said,' You don't know how hard we had to work to get it reduced. We had to convince them that otherwise bootlegging would be rampant. We requested them to give a 6-month trial and watch the duty collection shoot up. The records show that the duty collection has already gone up by 100%,' he says with a smirk.

We all know about the various lobbies and incentives that work in the Indian system. Apparently, the lobbying and the financial power of whisky producers was rather strong and they made an offer 'the government could not refuse.'

At the end of the day, who suffers? The whisky sellers like Diageo, Brown Forman and even the wild card White Mackay have plenty to gain, though outwardly they might mourn the death of fine wines of their portfolios.

Wine importers are only in the business to make money. They are already diversifying into beer, liquor imports, olive oil or other products that would make them stay afloat.

It is the middle class mumbaikers and other maharashtrians who had started enjoying the taste of decent wines, who would be deprived of the access to decent wine. And if other states imbibe the Maharashtra style of excise duties, we would revert back to a nation of whisky drinkers as we already are identified in the outside world or consigned to drinking cheap imported wines or the expensive cheap Indian wine, a few glaring exceptions notwithstanding.

There is also a string possibility that bootlegging and smuggling will become more rampant in Maharashtra. One often hears of Dubai being an indirect supplier of many high-duty, luxury products. Dubai does differentiate between caste, colour or creed but concentrates only on cash. Knowledgeable people assure me that I should not be pessimistic for the Maharashtrans as its denizens will not be deprived for long and soon will have access to fine wines thanks to these resources.

Subhash Arora
January 23, 2008

 

Comments:

Posted By : Mario Sequeira, Goa
July 19, 2008 12:03
Dear Subash, It is a pity that the Mumbai Excise has only been looking inwards when it comes to imported wines while the rest of the country looks outwards!! Regards Mario Sequeira
   
Posted By : Remie Law
Jan 20, 2008 8:58 AM
Dear Subhash,

I could clearly feel the frustration in your writings in Delhi Wine Club and Local Wine Events websites. I agree that the winners are large liquor companies hawking their basic entry level wines and hard liquors to the world. Passionate wine lovers like you have lost this round for a healthier lifestyle in India.

I strongly believe that wines should be allocated a special category. Then, a flat rate excise duty based on wine volume simplifies the whole process of taxation and its administration.

As such, I am also totally puzzled by the recent Budget announcement in Singapore. Here, it appears that Singapore's oft praised and admired tax system for wines has taken a step backwards. Apparently, for the sake of fairness, the new excise duty will be S$70 (U$50) per litre of alcohol across the board. Apparently wine and liquor have been lumped together in the same category-editor

To me, it clearly shows a total lack of understanding of wines as opposed to liquor. As we know, liquor is usually produced at a predetermined alcohol level, say, 35% or 40%. Whereas, the alcohol levels of wine vary depending on the sugar concentration at picking each year and the fermentation process to produce the wine with impeccable balance. Thus, the alcohol level of a wine may vary from year to year, 14% in a hot & very ripe year, 13% in a cooler one.

Imagine the administrative and pricing nightmare that will ensue, when the wine producer, having pre-printed his wine labels with 14% alcohol, encounters poor weather and harvests his grapes at 13.5% or even 13% alcohol. Are the many producers affected legally bound to reprint their labels all over again?

It is true that some regulators insist that the variation between label and actual be kept within +/- 0.5%. But now, in precise Singapore, what does the poor importer declare? A case in point- An importer showed me a clear example of the problem. It was 2 bottles of the same wine from 2 batches of the same vintage. One label was printed 9%, the other 9.5%.

Oh, the lengths we go in pursuit of our favourite beverage,

Remie Law
Hv@happyvines.com

www.happyvines.com

Singapore

 
Posted By : Dharti Desai
Jan 25, 2008 3:39 PM
Dear Subhash,

You have written very accurately and with great passion! How do we make this more visible in the mainstream?

Best regards, Dharti Desai
   
Posted By : Alok Chandra
Jan 24, 2008 7:25 PM
Totally agree with you, Subhash. The question is, who is behind the hike in excise duty on imported wines? We all know that nothing in India heppns without either 'Gaddi'(position) or 'gaddi'(money) - so would be interesting to find out what really made the wheels turn this time round.
   
Posted By : Suraj Giridharan
Jan 24, 2008 2:21 PM
Dear Subhash,

I an employee in the 'Imported Whisky' industry. I was just going through your article. Its well written indeed. I am quite impressed with the passion of a connoisseur. I quite understand the pain of someone being deprived a right to enjoy something because its expensive and not socially equitable. At least not in a capitalist democracy like ours. Please keep the fire burning.

Regards Suraj Giridharan
 
       

Want to Comment ?
Name  
Email   
Please enter your comments in the space provided below. If there is a problem, please write directly to arora@delwine.com. Thank you.


Captcha
Generate a new image

Type letters from the image:


Please note that it may take some time to get your comment published...Editor

Wine In India, Indian Wine, International Wine, Asian Wine Academy, Beer, Champagne, World Wine Academy, World Wine, World Wines, Retail, Hotel

     
 

 
 
Copyright©indianwineacademy, 2003-2020 |All Rights Reserved
Developed & Designed by Sadilak SoftNet