Shah Rukh Khan, Salman Khan and Katrina Kaif were part of  the entourage for one week’s celebrations, with King Khan reportedly charging  $900,000 for his performance for which advances had already been paid. It is  another matter that the stars reportedly decided  to cancel when the income tax department started probing into which actors were  involved and how much they were being paid by the influential families.
      
 While the wine industry is struggling with total profits for  last year less than the money being paid to the celebrities, gutka is a highly profitable business  and has millions wrapped around its use as ‘addicts’. Several state governments  have banned its use as an injurious drug under the constitution on various  occasions, but the producers are highly influential and unlike the wine  producers, are generally able to manipulate politicians and the bureaucrats in  their favour.  
      Wine is mistakenly interpreted as a harmful drink at times  by the state governments even though the production is encouraged by  Maharashtra and Karnataka and other states which are slowly waking up to the  fact that it is a revenue earner and job creator. Made from grapes like  Gewürztraminer and Grenache (although Cabernet Sauvignon, Shiraz, Zinfandel,  Chenin Blanc and Sauvignon Blanc are more common in India) it is undergoing a  crisis due to the bridled consumption because of hurdles created by the same  State governments and others alike. 
       Gutka is a  preparation of crushed betel nut, tobacco, catechu, lime and sweet or savoury flavourings like cardamom.  It is consumed much like chewing tobacco, and like chewing tobacco it is  considered responsible for oral cancer and other severe negative health effects  (Reference Wikipedia). It is a powdery, granular light brownish to white  substance. Within moments in the mouth, it begins to dissolve and turn deep red  in color. It imparts upon the user a "buzz" somewhat more intense  than that of tobacco.  
       Another visit to  the Indian Constitution, especially Section 47 is relevant. It reads, ‘the  State shall regard the raising of the level of nutrition and the standard of  living of its people and the improvement of public health as among its primary  duties and, in particular, the State shall endeavour to bring about prohibition  of the consumption except for medicinal purpose of intoxicating drinks and of  drugs which are injurious to health’.  
      The emphasis was  on improving public health, intoxicating drinks , intoxicating drugs and injurious to health. There is a strong and growing  quasi scientific evidence during the last two decades that wine in moderation-up  to two standard glasses a day is good for heart and other organs, implying that  it is medicinal and good for improving health.  
      Unfortunately, wine can also be  injurious and intoxicating beyond two glasses and it is, after all a drink  (alcoholic). Therefore, the States have the right to term it an intoxicating  drink, injurious to health and may ban its use like in Gujarat and partly in  Meghalaya or restrict consumption through taxation and sales policies, which  has in fact been happening. 
       On the other hand, some States  have understand the injurious effects of gutka on health and have banned it for  varied periods of time and the courts have supported the move. They are well  aware that gutka use can begin at a very young age and is addictive. 
       In 2008 about 5 million children  under 15 were addicted to Gutka. A survey in Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh  yielded precursor of mouth cancers in 16 percent of the children. 
        Unfortunately, the product is  highly profitable- with a high volume-high profit profile. But the companies  have such a strong financial muscle that they are able to get the decisions  overturned and despite the ‘drug’ being banned in some State or the other, the  profit- making machinery is working on 24/7 basis. No wonder the ‘families’ could  afford to spend the astronomical sum for only a part of the wedding and proudly  announced the obscene amount for bringing in the Bollywood stars.  
         
      It’s a pity that when the Constitution was made wine and  Gutka were not addressed specifically and Article 47 is not important enough  for the government to bring wine and Gutka in its gambit more specifically.  
      Meanwhile, I hope our Indian readers avoid the harmful Gutka  and love Gewürztraminer or Grenache… or any other grape in the form of healthy  wine (two glasses a day!) 
      Subhash Arora  |